Welcome to our Technology section from here you can click on your desired Technology image and use the Technology picture embed code to add to your blogs, forums, websites and other online media. The embed code contains all necessary CC attribution, that are mandatory to include, so you don't need to contribute the image authors manually. If you want, you can customize your Technology embed code: resize the Technology image as well as select the position in which you would like it to appear on in your article. It's then simply a case of copying the short code and pasting the Technology code into your post.
The use of the term "technology" has changed significantly over the last 200 years. Before the 20th century, the term was uncommon in English, and it was used either to refer to the description or study of the useful arts  or to allude to technical education, as in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (chartered in 1861). Get breaking science news on monster snakes and dinosaurs, aliens, spooky particles and more!Wiki info
The exact relations between science and technology in particular have been debated by scientists, historians, and policymakers in the late 20th century, in part because the debate can inform the funding of basic and applied science. In the immediate wake of World War II, for example, it was widely considered in the United States that technology was simply "applied science" and that to fund basic science was to reap technological results in due time. An articulation of this philosophy could be found explicitly in Vannevar Bush's treatise on postwar science policy, Science β The Endless Frontier: "New products, new industries, and more jobs require continuous additions to knowledge of the laws of natureΒ . . . This essential new knowledge can be obtained only through basic scientific research. " In the late-1960s, however, this view came under direct attack, leading towards initiatives to fund science for specific tasks (initiatives resisted by the scientific community). The issue remains contentious, though most analysts resist the model that technology simply is a result of scientific research.